-4K crop: the 1dx mk ii has a 4k crop factor of 1.3x, whereas the 5D mark iv has a 4k crop factor of 1.74x or something-120fps: the 1dx mk ii can do this at 1080p, while the 5d mark ii can only do this at 720p . As I currently shoot 1080p for clients that are ok with DSLR-level image quality, the 5D mark iv looks great to me.
Tough question here. The 5D series is definitely a better choice for video and faster shooting opportunities. And the Mark IV is better than the Mark III for those specific reasons. But in terms of image quality all will be very good. The Mark III and 6D are comparable in terms of IQ, but the Mark IV is ahead of both of them.
Canon 5D Mark III vs. Fuji X100S image quality 09 January 2014. Canon 5D Mk III vs. LEICA M 240 vs. Sony A7 Image Quality Comparison 19 December 2013. Canon 6D. Similar image quality smaller, lighter package with a few less controls, but with added Wi-Fi and GPS. Canon 5D Mark III versus Canon 6D.
While the 5D Mark IV has the specifications that create marginally higher-quality images and videos, the 6D Mark II features more modern controls and options that contribute to ease of use. Which of the two cameras to get really depends on how much time and effort you invest into photography or filmmaking.
Yet, they knew that image quality is the #1 selling point, so they couldn't market it with, "Same image quality with better AF and lots of tweaks." Instead of making improvements to the sensor hardware, they increased the noise reduction in JPEG processing and allowed two stops higher ISO--equivalent to pushing a 5D2's "H2".
iVjcRjL. s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/590s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/403s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/348s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/437s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/233s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/200s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/398s2sdja4ya7.pages.dev/280
canon 6d mark ii vs 5d mark iv image quality
